To help make sense of the local team finding themselves 20 out of 20, let us look towards the facts and figures of this season, so far. I watch a fair amount of MLS, but it's impossible to get a fair handle on how the season is going in the league top to bottom.
Below will be a ranking based on where the team is on the table (Points per Game - PPG) and ranked by Who Scored (WS) and Squawka (SQ). "Rank" is the average position of PPG, WS and SQ.
Rank! | Team | PPG | WS | SQ |
2 | FC Dallas | 2 | 1 | 2 |
2 | L.A. Galaxy | 4 | 2 | 1 |
4 | Colorado Rapids | 4 | 3 | 4 |
5 | Sporting Kansas City | 1 | 8 | 6 |
6 | Montreal Impact | 8 | 6 | 5 |
8 | Portland Timbers | 11 | 4 | 8 |
8 | Philadelphia Union | 8 | 10 | 7 |
9 | Real Salt Lake | 2 | 12 | 14 |
9 | New York City FC | 12 | 7 | 9 |
10 | San Jose Earthquakes | 4 | 14 | 12 |
10 | Orlando City | 7 | 8 | 15 |
10 | Houston Dynamo | 15 | 4 | 11 |
11 | Columbus Crew | 20 | 11 | 3 |
13 | Chicago Fire | 12 | 12 | 16 |
14 | New England Rev. | 14 | 16 | 13 |
15 | Vancouver Whitecaps | 10 | 17 | 17 |
15 | Seattle Sounders FC | 17 | 18 | 10 |
16 | Toronto FC | 15 | 15 | 18 |
19 | New York Red Bulls | 17 | 20 | 20 |
19 | DC United | 19 | 19 | 19 |
Here are the figures extended out with some helpful key performance indicators on the right.
PPG | Team | WS Rating | Squawka Rating | P | GD | Pts | Poss% | Pass% | Shot A | Shot F |
2.25 | Sporting Kansas City | 6.85 | 747 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 57 | 82 | 11 | 11 |
2.00 | FC Dallas | 6.97 | 825 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 50 | 75 | 9.8 | 15 |
2.00 | Real Salt Lake | 6.8 | 485 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 45 | 72 | 13.8 | 10.5 |
1.75 | L.A. Galaxy | 6.94 | 918 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 55 | 80 | 10.3 | 13.5 |
1.75 | Colorado Rapids | 6.92 | 769 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 54 | 78 | 11.5 | 15.8 |
1.75 | San Jose Earthquakes | 6.79 | 504 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 48 | 77 | 15.8 | 9 |
1.67 | Orlando City | 6.85 | 468 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 50 | 81 | 11 | 12.3 |
1.50 | Montreal Impact | 6.89 | 749 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 49 | 80 | 14.3 | 11 |
1.50 | Philadelphia Union | 6.84 | 709 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 47 | 74 | 13.8 | 13 |
1.40 | Vancouver Whitecaps | 6.71 | 408 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 44 | 73 | 15.2 | 11.2 |
1.33 | Portland Timbers | 6.91 | 612 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 50 | 80 | 11.3 | 20.7 |
1.25 | New York City FC | 6.87 | 562 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 58 | 79 | 12 | 17 |
1.25 | Chicago Fire | 6.8 | 415 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 45 | 74 | 15.5 | 10.3 |
1.20 | New England Rev. | 6.73 | 487 | 5 | -2 | 6 | 50 | 74 | 14.2 | 12.2 |
1.00 | Toronto FC | 6.75 | 364 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 45 | 70 | 14 | 11.3 |
1.00 | Houston Dynamo | 6.91 | 507 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 49 | 72 | 15 | 13.8 |
0.75 | New York Red Bulls | 6.51 | 112 | 4 | -5 | 3 | 55 | 72 | 13 | 14.8 |
0.75 | Seattle Sounders FC | 6.65 | 511 | 4 | -2 | 3 | 51 | 82 | 12 | 11.3 |
0.60 | DC United | 6.62 | 138 | 5 | -6 | 3 | 47 | 71 | 12.8 | 14 |
0.50 | Columbus Crew | 6.82 | 806 | 4 | -2 | 2 | 55 | 82 | 13.3 | 14.5 |
Looks like Squawka loves the Crew so far this year and Who Scored is kinda = meh. I'm thinking the trajectory of this team is middle of the table.
No comments:
Post a Comment