Showing posts with label player evaluation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label player evaluation. Show all posts

Sunday, February 15, 2015

Crew SC Behind Curve After ATX Pro Challenge, Player Evals

After a messy first half against FC Dallas in the semifinal match, Crew SC rounded off this mini-event with a so-so affair with the Austin Aztex. Not a whole lot to dig into yet regarding the Crew SC preseason other than the excitement / energy / newness of last year is gone. Gregg Berhalter has some work ahead of him. They are a little behind where they were last year at this time.

With that. It's only two preseason games. Not big on grading players but I feel like it's fair enough to evaluate a player on a performance based on whether or not they met expectations based on their role with the team and expected talent level.

A "1" given for a player exceeding what I expected, "0" meeting it and a "-1" falling short.

Name... FC Dallas , Austin Aztex = Final

Did well in Austin:

Hernan Grana... 1 , 0 = 1
Waylon Francis... 1 , 0 = 1
Tony Tchani... 1 , 0 = 1
Ethan Finlay... 1 , 0 = 1
Kristinn Steindorsson... 1 , 0 = 1
Chad Barson... 0 , 1 = 1
Justin Meram... 0 , 1 = 1
Mohammed Saeid... 0 , 1 = 1
Brad Stuver... 1 , DNP = 1

Met Expectations:

Federico Higuain... 0 , 0 = 0
Kei Kamara... 0 , 0 = 0
Tyson Wahl... 0 , 0 = 0
Kalen Ryden... 0 , 0 = 0
Ben Speas... 0 , 0 = 0
Matt Lampson... DNP , 0 = 0
Ben Swanson... DNP , 0 = 0
Wil Trapp... DNP , 0 = 0
Adam Bedell... DNP , 0 = 0
Michael Parkhust... 0 , DNP = 0
Romain Gall... 0 , DNP = 0
Sergio Campbell... DNP , 0 = 0

Fell Below Expectations:

Steve Clark... -1 , 0 = -1
Hector Jimenez... -1 , 0 = -1
Kevan George... -1 , DNP = -1
Aaron Schoenfeld... -1 , DNP = -1
Emanuel Pogatetz... -1 , DNP = -1
Chris Klute... -1 , -1 = -2

Hernan Grana

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

Crew Defensive Middle Fielding

Now that the Crew are 13 games into the 2013 MLS season I figure it is as good as time as any to take a look at the defensive midfielder engine in Robert Warzycha's 4-2-3-1 formation.

It's a defensive focused formation, no doubt. This is Warzycha we are talking about.

To date, the formation has succeeded in only allowing an even 1.00 goals per game. If you dig a little bit deeper you'll also see that this team has not allowed more that two goals on the year. Going back to last year, it has only happened three times. To this degree, the Crew have been successful.

Also, it should be mentioned... very Polish.

So, how about the DM's the Crew trot out every week? There have been a few of them and they have a decent amount of minutes played of which to compare 2013 players. Let's start there.

Mins Played : Player
764 : Danny O'Rourke
585 : Tony Tchani
555 : Agustin Viana
374 : Matias Sanchez
106 : Kevan George
20 : Konrad Warzycha

Right off the bat I'm going to take Kevan and Konrad out. Not enough time. That leaves us with four dudes. First up, let's take a look at player ratings by various outlets around the internets.

Castrol League Rank Percentile : Player
36% : Agustin Viana
42% : Danny O'Rourke
47% : Tony Tchani
64% : Matias Sanchez

Interesting here that Viana jumps both Tchani and O'Rourke. Now let's take a look at WhoScored.com's ranking. Who is "Who Scored"? Well, look them up. They have access to all the Opta data and a lot of time on their hands.

WhoScored.com Percentile : Player
32% : Agustin Viana
70% : Matias Sanchez
75% : Danny O'Rourke
76% : Tony Tchani

Well, well. Viana stays at the top, followed up by Matias Sanchez. Next up are my player ratings. HELLTOWN PLAYER RATINGS.

Helltown Rating Percentile : Player
36% : Danny O'Rourke
44% : Tony Tchani
47% : Agustin Viana
57% : Matias Sanchez

--------
AVERAGE THEM UP

If you average the league rank of each of these Crew DMs, here is what you get:

38% : Agustin Viana
51% : Danny O'Rourke
56% : Tony Tchani
64% : Matias Sanchez

Pretty clear cut right? We've done the homework here. Three different player ratings gives us an accurate picture of who should start. Ok.

--------
Wait. What about opponent difficulty when playing? Gosh, I almost forgot.

Avg Opponent Rank : Name
10.0 : Matias Sanchez
10.8 : Tony Tchani
13.1 : Danny O'Rourke
14.0 : Agustin Viana

Thing here is that O'Rourke and Viana have played against the weakest competition. What this suggests is that the reason they are rated highest is because they have played crappy teams.

...and here is where Opta and most other player rating systems fail. They don't take into consideration the quality level of the opposing player.

--------
I'm working on it though. Draw your own conclusions on which DM should play this weekend. For me?

Well, I'm going to keep crunching the numbers.

Thursday, November 8, 2012

Opponent Difficulty, Crew Players

Ever wonder if certain players get the short end of the stick and tossed out against better teams? Me too.

Major League Soccer implemented an unbalanced schedule this year so it's imperative to take into consideration each Crew player's opponent when rating players.

% Appearances v. Top Half of Table : Total Apps

70% : Cole Grossman : 10
67% : Carlos Mendes : 12
65% : Dilly Duka : 20
64% : Justin Meram : 22
61% : Chris Birchall : 18
58% : Julius James : 12
57% : Kevan George : 7
56% : Jairo Arrieta : 18
55% : Olman Vargas : 11
54% : Tony Tchani : 22
53% : Josh Williams : 30

51% : Andy Gruenebaum : 33
50% : Eddie Gaven : 34
48% : Sebastian Miranda : 33


47% : Nemanja Vukovic : 15
46% : Chad Marshall : 24
44% : Emilio Rentería : 27
44% : Aaron Schoenfeld : 9
43% : Danny O'Rourke : 21
41% : Eric Gehrig : 12
40% : Ethan Finlay : 15
40% : Shaun Francis : 10
39% : Federico Higuain : 13
38% : Milovan Mirosevic : 26
36% : Bernardo Anor : 11
33% : Matt Lampson : 3
0% : Tom Heinemann : 1


If you are an avid fan of the Crew this list might surprise you. There are a number of very important callouts.

1. Meram and Duka were literally thrown to wolves. Large, angry wolves. 22 and 20 total appearances - 2/3rds against the top half.

2. Josh Williams (30 apps) didn't get the memo about apps against cupcakes. Look at the difference between him and Milovan Mirosevic (26 apps).

3. Mirosevic. Hard to argue with this. He missed key games against really good teams. Hard to figure his season. All indications from my perspective point towards good dude but that might hide a few nagging game day flaws.

4. No question Higuain came out of the gates in a great way, but very important to consider the opposition. Also consider the fact that opponents were halfway through a long season and he was just starting his.

5. Grossman. Considering how he was used, this season could have ended his career. Instead he finished with excellent metrics against excellent teams. It's not chance. Trust the numbers people. Close your eyes and trust the numbers.

6. Birchall, Tchani, Arrieta; Notable. Good.

----------
[EDITED ON FRIDAY NOV. 9TH, 11:00 AM. Originally Missed: final regular season game for players that participated in it. Last match was against a team in the bottom half. Both % vs. Top Half and Apps have been adjusted and updated]

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Helltown Beer Crew Player Ratings

Over the past few weeks I've covered a number of different Crew (and league) player ratings from the 2012 season. For this post I will list out my own ratings. They will be posted on the right with the rest to compare.

QUICK NOTES ON MY RATING MODEL

Throughout the year I rate every player in Major League Soccer. My model is based on something I came up with early last year and it has served me well since. I like doing it and is becoming more reliable for me. However, sometime last summer it became fully self aware, took over my computer and now even controls how I think and even feel. I'm surprised it has even allowed me to write this much.

HELLTOWN BEER RATING : NAME : LEAGUE RANK

78 : Eddie Gaven : 9
69 : Andy Gruenebaum : 43
68 : Sebastian Miranda : 44
60 : Josh Williams : 74
56 : Milovan Mirosevic : 92
53 : Chad Marshall : 109
48 : Jairo Arrieta : 139
43 : Emilio Rentería : 168
40 : Chris Birchall : 188
40 : Danny O'Rourke : 191
37 : Tony Tchani : 208
35 : Federico Higuain : 226
32 : Nemanja Vukovic : 241
31 : Justin Meram : 251
30 : Dilly Duka : 257

28 : LEAGUE MEDIAN

27 : Carlos Mendes : 281
24 : Eric Gehrig : 297
22 : Julius James : 314
22 : Olman Vargas : 316
19 : Shaun Francis : 336
18 : Cole Grossman : 344
18 : Bernardo Anor : 346
16 : Ethan Finlay : 368
16 : Kevan George : 370
14 : Aaron Schoenfeld : 398
10 : Matt Lampson : 449
8 : Ben Speas : 474
7 : Tommy Heinemann : 495

If it looks funny that a 28 is league median, it's because 236 of the 532 players that saw minutes played less than 900. Bad MLS teams love to toss players out on the pitch instead of doing the homework beforehand. Half the league was bad this year. Thus, lots of players.

164 players didn't make it to 450 minutes.

My model takes 16 league stats (that I prefer) - applies value through efficiencies, adds a dash of weight, glances at the league table and conjures up a point total.

I don't take into account things like potential, or perceived talent. It also ignores fan favorites and the dreams of the hopeful - yet, lost.

What is does is tell me who is doing well in MLS and contributing to the team in relationship to the rest of the league, based on actual results. I like actual results, as should you.

------
I'm building up to a big fat final player grade based on Crew player rating from across the internets.

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

"The Castrol Index" Columbus Crew

The "Castrol Index" is another Major League Soccer player measurement system. Of the two previous I've mentioned so far it is of the more complex variety. Here is how the creators of the system sum it up:
The Castrol Index tracks every move on the field and assesses whether it has a positive or negative impact on a team’s ability to score or concede a goal.

Seems simple enough, but it is not. Read more about it HERE.

Below is how Castrol ranks the Crew players that saw time this year. On the Left is where the player ranked in the league. On the Right is the Castrol "score".

LEAGUE RANK : CASTROL SCORE (PTS)
28 : Andy Gruenebaum : 636
32 : Jairo Arrieta : 607
39 : Chad Marshall : 584
75 : Eddie Gaven : 525
121 : Milovan Mirosevic : 483
135 : Josh Williams : 471
177 : Chris Birchall : 434
194 : Danny O'Rourke : 414
204 : Emilio Rentería : 406
210 : Federico Higuain : 396
213 : Sebastian Miranda : 392

235 : LEAGUE MEDIAN RANK

238 : Tony Tchani : 349
255 : Justin Meram : 310
261 : Nemanja Vukovic : 302
273 : Olman Vargas : 271
275 : Dilly Duka : 269
303 : Eric Gehrig : 211
306 : Carlos Mendes : 205
320 : Julius James : 179
331 : Bernardo Anor : 142
341 : Cole Grossman : 126
343 : Kevan George : 121
361 : Ethan Finlay : 85
392 : Aaron Schoenfeld : 53
416 : Matt Lampson : 29
424 : Ben Speas : 20
458 : Tommy Heinemann : 0

I spent some time with this rating model last year and determined it to be not sustainable but at the same time something worth while to pay attention to.

Going back through my notes I also notice that they have changed they way they score. It use to be a "7.65" type score, which I assumed was on a 10 pt scale. Now it is a whole number.

For the purposes of this blog I am going to turn the "league rank" on the left of the players name into a percentage.

EXAMPLE, ANDY GRUENEBAUM
Andy finished ranked 28th in the league. 470 total players were tracked. That puts Andy in the top 10%. Or, better than 94% of the league (players ranked 29-470).

I'm going to use the 94% for consistency on this blog - I like my player scores on a 100 pt scale if the entire league is involved.

94% : Andy Gruenebaum
93% : Jairo Arrieta
92% : Chad Marshall
84% : Eddie Gaven
74% : Milovan Mirosevic
71% : Josh Williams
62% : Chris Birchall
59% : Danny O'Rourke
57% : Emilio Rentería
55% : Federico Higuain
55% : Sebastian Miranda

49% : Tony Tchani
46% : Justin Meram
44% : Nemanja Vukovic
42% : Olman Vargas
41% : Dilly Duka
36% : Eric Gehrig
35% : Carlos Mendes
32% : Julius James
30% : Bernardo Anor
27% : Cole Grossman
27% : Kevan George
23% : Ethan Finlay
17% : Aaron Schoenfeld
11% : Matt Lampson
10% : Ben Speas
3% : Tommy Heinemann

Not any different order than the first list at the top of this blog, just a more usable number than... whatever that number is that Castrol uses. This number makes more sense to me. Greater than 50%? in the top half. Less than 33%? Bottom third.

Looking up and down the list, I think it works. I know that they (Castrol Index people) are still trying to come to terms with how much total player minutes steers the player score.

Of note above; Sebastian Miranda, who tallied loads of minutes, down the list. O'Rourke didn't play in over half the games but finish close to the top third of the league.

----------
If it looks like I'm building a model to ultimately give out one gigantic player grade, it's because I am. Right before your eyes! Watch! As I unlink these rings! Still a few more player ratings to post up yet (including my own). To the right of this blog will be all the ratings so you too can be informed about things. Especially going into the "exit interview" part of the MLS season.

Monday, November 5, 2012

The Guldan Rating, SB Nation

Patrick Guldan is the Managing Editor of SB Nation's "Columbus Crew community". After most Crew matches he posts a Notes and Grades summary of the previous game. In it he rates the Crew side of the match using the following system (in Mr. Guldan's words):
"Note on Grades: I have set 5 as an average performance. The player had both good and bad events on the field. Under 5 is a disappointing performance. Above 5 is a notable performance."

I've come to enjoy this feature over the past couple seasons as I like that he grounds player performance on average and works off that. A lot of player ratings out there (I see them most often with USMNT) use a 1-10 scale with no indication of average performance.

**I'm going to cut to the chase than explain lower down the post.**

What I did was take the number of times a player rated a 7 and above and divided that by total number of times rated.

RATING : NAME : TIMES RATED

55.6% : Federico Higuain : 9
46.2% : Jairo Arrieta : 13
35.3% : Danny O'Rourke : 17
33.3% : Andy Gruenebaum : 27
33.3% : Matt Lampson : 3
32.1% : Eddie Gaven : 28
30.0% : Milovan Mirosevic : 20
21.7% : Josh Williams : 23
21.4% : Dilly Duka : 14
20.0% : Kevan George : 5

17.9% : TEAM

16.7% : Chad Marshall : 18
16.7% : Chris Birchall : 12
15.4% : Sebastian Miranda : 26
12.5% : Cole Grossman : 8
11.1% : Justin Meram : 18
10.0% : Olman Vargas : 10
10.0% : Carlos Mendes : 10
9.1% : Emilio Rentería : 22
9.1% : Eric Gehrig : 11
9.1% : Nemanja Vukovic : 11
7.1% : Coaching : 28
5.6% : Tony Tchani : 18

0.0% : Bernardo Anor : 10
0.0% : Shaun Francis : 7
0.0% : Ethan Finlay : 11
0.0% : Kirk Urso : 5
0.0% : Aaron Schoenfeld : 8
0.0% : Julius James : 9
0.0% : Ben Speas : 1

WHY DID I DO IT THIS WAY

Another thing I like about Guldan's system is that in the description it doesn't indicate if "10" is even the highest number or even if 1 is the lowest. Up until recently I'd never seen even an "8" given out by Guldan (I talked about that earlier this year).

29 total Crew players were rated 402 times (on average, about 14x a player). Plenty of times to draw valuable information out. Here's how the score distribution looked. On the left is his rating (LOW is bad, like - a 2; High is good, 9): On the right is the number of times that Score was handed out.

2 : 2
3 : 18
4 : 50
5 : 99
6 : 161
7 : 64
8 : 5
9 : 3

No "1" or "10" this year. Again, Guldan's system pivots off a 5 as average rating. What this reminds me of is a Net Promoter Score (NPS). It's a system that simply asks the question "Would you recommend this product to a friend". In the Net Promoter system average scores are thrown out. Which is exactly what I did. The reason being is to eliminate the 'passive' ratings. In the retail / maufacturing world 'passive' customers can be seen as the enemy. Why? I doesn't give you any actionable items. Without actionable tasks you waste a lot of time on nada.

If you have a customer nailing your ass to the wall... you want to focus on that. NOT the folks in the middle, NPS treats that as noise. Same goes for the higher ratings. Growing your company, you want to figure out what works. NPS can be valuable in this way.

What I did to derive a usable number from Guldan's rating system is take the total number of times a player scores a 7 and above and divide that by the total number of times the player was rated. I feel that shows best what Patrick Guldan views as quality.

EXAMPLE: DILLY DUKA
Duka was rated a total of 14 times by Patrick Guldan. He (Duka) got rated 4 twice, a 5 four times, a 6 five times and a 7 three times. It looks like this:

GULDAN SCORE : # OF TIMES RATED
4 : 2
5 : 4
6 : 5
7 : 3

Dilly didn't recieve any ratings others than those above. What I'm going to do is throw out the anything below 7... take the 3x at a "7" and divide it by total number of times rated, 14.

3 / 14 = 21.4% : Duka

Taking out the "detractors" pulls my number away from true NPS. I did this, in part, because Guldan's rating isn't on a 1-10 scale. Also, NPS has many critics, including me.

--------------------
Taking the "average" rating of players leaves almost all at around 5 or 6. Removing the middle ground gives me more to go off of. Had a brief Twitter conversation with the great Steve Sirk (@stevesirk) about how the Crew players with the most time naturally find the middle of the road (Team averages). A NPS type score is a simple way of discounting average and bringing important items into focus.

Of course Guldan's rating system isn't the only thing to go off of, nor is only using "NPS" if you are a retail company. Guldan's ratings are an "outsider but almost insider" type rating that should only be taken as such. Meaning, he has contact with team officials and players but isn't part of the payroll. There are hints of favoritism here and there but generally his scores are honest. I'll post this on the right side blog though so you, dear informed reader, can make your own conclusions about things.

If you want to mess with Patrick Guldan's player ratings you can find them HERE. Mr. Guldan didn't rate every week (that I could find) but I pulled as much as there was available on his SB Nation Crew blog. Statistically; it's enough to evaluate how he views the performance of the players this year.

I'm posting it as part of my ongoing evaluation of Crew players.

I appreciate Patrick Guldan's player ratings and look forward to them again next year.

Saturday, November 3, 2012

Crew Player Evaluations, GD p90

The Columbus Crew found themselves on a dead even Zero Goal Difference (GD) for the year. Below are players that drove that number up or down for each 90 minutes on the pitch.

GD p90 : NAME : 90 MIN GMs

[GROUP I]
+0.90 : Cole Grossman : 5.6
+0.66 : Carlos Mendes : 10.5
+0.38 : Justin Meram : 10.7
+0.32 : Nemanja Vukovic : 12.4
+0.27 : Federico Higuain : 11.2
+0.23 : Emilio Rentería : 17.1
+0.17 : Dilly Duka : 11.9
+0.15 : Josh Williams : 27.0
+0.13 : Julius James : 7.9
+0.12 : Sebastian Miranda : 32.0
+0.11 : Danny O'Rourke : 17.8

This Group I includes the players the Crew should be locking up for next year. Notable here is Nemanja Vukovic and Emilio Renteria. Two players, based on how they were used, that are seen as part-time contributors by the club staff. This metric tells us that they contribute positively (both played enough time to make a statistically significant contribution).

The class of this group comes in the form of Josh Williams and Sebastian Miranda. Considering the amount of time the put in, both these guys should be hardwired into next year's plans.

Helltown Hero, Cole Grossman, is so out of control high it's crazy. I don't care that his Blue Devil bball teams beat up on my Campbell U. Fighting Camels on a regular basis... Grossman's club numbers are impressive... On top of that he contributed exactly as I would expect a Duke grad to; Intelligently and confidently - with a passing hint of smugness. He's my favorite type of player. One that knows how to win on the team level - also, cerebral and able to survive outside the sport.

[GROUP II]
+0.03 : Andy Gruenebaum : 32.4
+0.00 : Jairo Arrieta : 17.0
-0.03 : Eddie Gaven : 33.2
-0.04 : Milovan Mirosevic : 23.8
-0.06 : Chris Birchall : 16.8

Look at the games these guys racked up. These are the guys that drove the whole of the 2012 season. Consistent performers, but like your Crew toiling their craft at the middle of the table? Pick these guys each match.

[GROUP III]
-0.14 : Tony Tchani : 14.8
-0.17 : Chad Marshall : 23.8
-0.36 : Shaun Francis : 5.6
-0.37 : Bernardo Anor : 5.5
-0.44 : Eric Gehrig : 9.0
-0.54 : Olman Vargas : 7.4

Group III is the bad group. You don't want your name here if you have significant minutes. Especially if your name is Tony Tchani and Chad Marshall.

Below is going to be the guys that didn't see enough time to matter on an individual level. However, as a group, they matter. Just last week a friend of mine sent me an email detailing winning percentage of players in his pickup basketball league. I dug into it and found an all to familiar fact. Players that don't play much hurt your chances of winning. Meaning, The more players you have getting "spot" duty each year the worse off you will be. Since Robert Warzycha took over his teams seem to be hounded by players that pepper the line up.

[GROUP IV]
+1.41 : Ben Speas : 0.7
+0.00 : Kevan George : 4.7
+0.00 : Matt Lampson : 1.6
-0.30 : Aaron Schoenfeld : 3.3
-1.27 : Ethan Finlay : 4.7
-18.00 : Tommy Heinemann : 0.1

Ethan Finlay was dangerously close to topping that 5 game (450 minute) mark. I saw him play a lot this year and am convinced that he is a good soccer player but the way he was jammed into the lineup early on was a mistake. He is too small to play up top, yet he was put there (he actually suffered injury due to that). Finlay can be best used as a player in training behind Sebastian Miranda at Right Back.

-------------
The numbers above are only one way to measure performance, though. With something like GD while on the pitch, look for players with over 10 games (900 minutes). They are the guys that drove results.

Saturday, October 27, 2012

PART 2: Preliminary Evaluation, Crew

In my last post I took a good look at how players were doing in relationship to the Team as a whole. Looking at it that way sort of gives me an idea on which parts directed the 2012 Columbus Crew.

In this post I'm going to look at the similar topics but instead focus on the average number of points a player earns when starting. The way it works is similar to the way a pitcher earns a win in baseball, with a slight difference; I'm keeping the end match result with the starter even if different when he left the field - whereas a Pitcher only gets a result if it is the same as when he was taken out. Why, you ask?

The reason for this is three fold:

A. Much less scoring in soccer so the impact of the subbed player in soccer doesn't single handedly control the result of the match like a middle reliever or closer can, unless you have a guy named Messi on your bench but even then it would be a statistically rare event.
B. Play / pace / flow of soccer match is dictated by starters. The starters do most of the heavy lifting (good or bad). Much of the match determined by lineup.
C. I only have so much time, cut me some slack! As with any statistic it isn't the exact number that matters, the value in the number is to tell you whether the player contributing positively or negatively. Going out 2 or 13 decimal points is for mathematical engineers who have much more data to digest (and get paid).

I understand if the way I am measuring this is a turnoff, but I find the results valuable and reliable. I'm always trying to find different ways of measuring player and team results. Sometimes it works, sometimes not but always learning as I go.

Now, let's take a look at Average Points Earned per Game (PPG) when each individual player starts against team ranked in the Top Half of the League Table (2012). Why: I want to know who performed best against the best. The Crew finished smack dab in the middle of the table (10th).

2012 PPG v Top H : NAME : GMs STARTED v. Top H

2.20 : Cole Grossman : 5
1.75 : Carlos Mendes : 8
1.75 : Dilly Duka : 8
1.60 : Nemanja Vukovic : 5
1.25 : Emilio Renteria : 8
1.25 : Sebastián Miranda : 16
1.25 : Joshua Williams : 16
1.20 : Justin Meram : 10
1.20 : Chris Birchall : 10
1.18 : Eddie Gaven : 17
1.18 : Andy Gruenebaum : 17
1.14 : Tony Tchani : 7
1.14 : Danny O´Rourke : 7
0.91 : Chad Marshall : 11
0.90 : Jairo Obando Arrieta : 10
0.80 : Julius James : 5
0.44 : Milovan Mirosevic : 9

(Here are the guys with less than 5 starts)
1.50 : Shaun Francis : 2
1.00 : Bernardo Anor : 3
0.67 : Olman Vargas : 3
0.33 : Federico Higuaín : 3
0.33 : Eric Gehrig : 3

I talked about this in my last post but worth mentioning again because the Crew really struggled against top competition this year. Particularly notable at the bottom are Marshall, Arrieta, Mirosevic. James only had 5 starts, so like Grossman at the top, it should be only really looked at as likely trend.

On the positive side I like Mendes and Duka along with Miranda and Williams as the solid performers against the top. Remember, this is only against teams 1-9 on the table.

-----
LOOKING BACK TO MOVE FORWARD

To put some of the 2012 numbers in perspective I pulled the results for last year for each player when they faced a team in the top half. It worked out to be teams 1-8 on the table since the Crew were 9th.

2011 PPG v Top H : NAME : GMs STARTED v. Top H

2.00 : Rich Balchan : 8
1.86 : Kevin Burns : 7
1.73 : Eddie Gaven : 11
1.57 : Emmanuel Ekpo : 14
1.44 : Chad Marshall : 16
1.43 : Tom Heinemann : 7
1.43 : Julius James : 14
1.40 : Dejan Rusmir : 5
1.40 : Emilio Renteria : 5
1.36 : Joshua Gardner : 11
1.35 : Sebastián Miranda : 17
1.25 : Will Hesmer : 16
1.14 : Andrés Mendoza : 14
1.08 : Robbie Rogers : 13
0.63 : Dilly Duka : 8

(Here are the guys with less than 5 starts)
3.00 : Justin Meram : 2
3.00 : Andy Gruenebaum : 1
1.50 : Bernardo Anor : 4
0.25 : Danny O´Rourke : 4
0.25 : Shaun Francis : 4

Looking at it this way you can see that the 2011 team was better at beating the best in Major League Soccer. 2012 only saw four players with over 5 starts >1.50 PPG. Curious, because as a team the Crew earned a higher avg. PPG in 2012.

The stand outs in 2011 featured mostly players that didn't play this year... Balchan, Burns, Ekpo, Heinemann, Rusmir. Interesting that only Balchan and Heinemann are still with the team (didn't play due to injury).

I'm sure there are a few rolling their eyes at Kevin Burns. The guy, for whatever reason, fell out of favor with fans and management last year. Numbers don't lie - your eyes do (especially after you have been drinking, evaluating from field level or the Nordecke and tweeting the whole time). No question that Burns contributed against quality opposition. Both he and Rusmir performed significantly better than their 2012 replacements (Birchall and Mirosevic). If the move away from Burns and Rusmir had to do with injury or contract than that is one thing, but to replace due to performance and/or results is another. If it is the latter, it was a failure. The time and effort to find, sign and move Birchall and Mirosevic could have been put into something more productive.

Here are the two lists (2011/2012) merged. PPG represents combined results from both years.

2011+2012 PPG v Top H : NAME : GMs STARTED v. Top H

2.20 : Cole Grossman : 5
2.00 : Rich Balchan : 8
1.86 : Kevin Burns : 7
1.75 : Carlos Mendes : 8
1.60 : Nemanja Vukovic : 5
1.57 : Emmanuel Ekpo : 14
1.50 : Justin Meram : 12
1.43 : Tom Heinemann : 7
1.40 : Dejan Rusmir : 5
1.39 : *Eddie Gaven : 28
1.36 : Joshua Gardner : 11
1.31 : *Emilio Renteria : 13
1.30 : *Sebastián Miranda : 33
1.29 : *Bernardo Anor : 7
1.28 : Andy Gruenebaum : 18
1.26 : *Julius James : 19
1.25 : Will Hesmer : 16
1.25 : Joshua Williams : 16
1.22 : *Chad Marshall : 27
1.20 : Chris Birchall : 10
1.19 : *Dilly Duka : 16
1.14 : Andrés Mendoza : 14
1.08 : Robbie Rogers : 13
1.00 : Tony Tchani : 8
0.90 : Jairo Obando Arrieta : 10
0.82 : *Danny O´Rourke : 11
0.67 : *Shaun Francis : 6
0.67 : Olman Vargas : 3
0.44 : Milovan Mirosevic : 9
0.33 : Federico Higuaín : 3
0.20 : Eric Gehrig : 5

* Started more than 5 games both years. Pulling them out looks like this:

1.39 : *Eddie Gaven : 28
1.31 : *Emilio Renteria : 13
1.30 : *Sebastián Miranda : 33
1.29 : *Bernardo Anor : 7
1.26 : *Julius James : 19
1.22 : *Chad Marshall : 27
1.19 : *Dilly Duka : 16
0.82 : *Danny O´Rourke : 11
0.67 : *Shaun Francis : 6

Out of the players to see significant time both years only Dilly Duka and Danny O'Rourke improved (Duka, remarkably so). I believe it has to do with how they were used last year to this. As in 2011 both only saw spot starts while 2012 saw them starting more (O'Rourke still shaky).

-----
CLOSING COMMENT
The achilles heel for the Crew this year was when regular starters, in particular; new signings late in the year, faced quality teams. The Crew faced teams in the top half of the table an equal 17 times in both 2011 and 2012. 2011 saw two more wins in those 17.

Perhaps this has to do with unbalanced scheduling or perhaps it just has to do with new players adjusting to new lives in a different city (or country). The answer isn't really clear.

What is clear is that I hope the team makes informed decisions about players going into this offseason. Personal feelings, vendetta's, cultural differences, revenge, fan outrage/favor or bias should always take a backseat to results.

Create a reliable and valuable measurement system - explain the system to your team - reward those who perform above expectations / punish those below.

Is solely looking at record against good teams the only tool to use? Of course not. Is it something that should be valued? I think so.