Never in the history of American Soccer has there been such
a profound ideological divide amongst people who share a deep passion for the beautiful
game. The current debate, easily witnessed and joined, can be found growing
deep roots in the rich soil of soccer forums, message boards, blogs, and
websites.
Comparing the promotion/relegation debate to the abortion
debate would be, at the very least, a gross insult to a complex human
sentiment. Yet, the debate within the North American Soccer Community bears
some striking similarities to the fight to safely reduce the number of
abortions in the United States.
Words such as “idiot,” “wrong,” “stupid,” “dim-witted,” “brain-dead”
and worse are often tossed around when people on both sides of the pro/rel
debate argue their side. In this post, I will make an effort to explain the
source and motivation which leads to the promotion/relegation dispute spewing
such venom.
A good starting point is the incredibly simple nature of our
sport. Given a serviceable round object and at least two people, the game of
soccer can sprout anywhere: in a gym, on the playground, in a basement, an
alley or the street. Soccer is a sport of both the people and the person.
We try to challenge ourselves: how many juggles can we get?
We try to best our opponents: a simple step-over or touch through the
defender’s legs sees us on our way to goal.
There is a sense of the primordial ooze about our sport. The
heart races, the knees and shins sometimes bleed. Dirt and grass stains seep
into our very being.
We start at an early age, a simple single-celled organism:
kick the ball, laugh, chase. We slowly, over the years, become a mosaic, an
Escher painting: unpredictable, challenging, provocative.
These things are the core of our sport. We never shed these
things. They may be buried deep inside when we reach adulthood; but, they
continue to fan the flames of competition, even at the highest, most organized
levels of our sport.
So, how does this simple yet powerful aspect of our sport
manifest itself in the ideological divide between proponents and opponents of
the promotion and relegation debate? Plainly stated, there are those who wish
to protect themselves and the mature version of our sport from the uncertainty
crawling to the shore from the thick and wicked pool of primordial ooze. And
then, there are those who wish to gather up the beautiful game and dive into
the primordial ooze.
One side cannot stand the constant stress of random chance,
and so, struggles to find order, codifies the un-codifiable and builds barriers
between the game and the ooze.
The other side wants to let the ooze run free, and so,
demands that all involved compete in the primordial soup. From teams, to fans,
to towns, to owners, this second group wants the very essence of our sport, the
people and the person, on display in every way possible.
I count my self in the second group. There is already enough
in our American culture that is codified, walled-off and protected. Banks write
banking legislation to protect themselves from the downside of competition.
Politicians manipulate so that they have safety nets to land softly and richly
after terms run out. Owners of NHL, NBA, MLB and NFL teams quash competition in
order to shelter themselves from the very competition they profess to admire.
The players in these sports compete, but the owners do not take part. They
build dams to hold back the primordial ooze. Players risk injury, the end of
an already short career. They uproot their families year after year. Owners sit
in luxury boxes and count money, knowing that failure will be rewarded with
better draft picks, an easier schedule, a move to another city and layer after
layer of protection from the very things they are selling to their customer.
Our sport is an escape from the mundane. All those involved
should be constantly evolving from simple organism to Escher complexity, always
in search of the playground, the step-over, the alley, the gym, the next level.
